Negotiations between Australia and the European Union on a free trade agreement have reached an impasse, with significant issues unresolved after five years of talks. Key points of contention include agricultural exports and product labeling.
The disagreement centers around EU restrictions on the labeling of certain Australian products, such as feta cheese and prosecco, which are categorized as protected in the EU. Additionally, Australia has raised concerns about the EU’s unwillingness to allow tariff-free imports of Australian beef and sheep.
In July, Australia withdrew from the proposed deal, citing inadequate provisions for its agricultural products. This move reflects pressure from Australian farmers, who have expressed concerns about the potential long-term disadvantages of the current deal framework. Fiona Simson, former president of the National Farmers’ Federation, referred to the proposal as a ‘dud deal’.
David Uren, a senior fellow at the ASPI think tank, sees the stalled negotiations as indicative of a global trend towards protectionism. This trend, he suggests, complicates the pursuit of free trade agreements among large industrialized nations.
Australian ministers have recently announced the rejection of the EU’s free trade proposals, indicating that an agreement is unlikely in the near future. The decision has been welcomed by Australia’s largest farm industry group, praising the government for protecting the interests of Australian farmers.
On the other hand, Bloomberg News reports that while there was consensus on most areas of the free trade agreement, specific agricultural issues, including Australia’s desire for increased access to the European market for its beef, mutton, and sugar, have been a major stumbling block. Conversely, the EU seeks to end the use of geographical indicators on Australian products like Prosecco and feta.
In a related development, the EU is reportedly exploring options to utilize Ukrainian grain or fertilizer exports as part of a broader deal with Egypt, potentially including provisions for food imports. This information comes from two EU officials and was shared by EU council president Charles Michel. The specifics of the deal remain confidential, but it aims to address economic risks for Egypt, especially given its proximity to conflict zones.
As the situation unfolds, both Australia and the EU are navigating the complexities of international trade agreements in an increasingly protectionist global landscape.