The secondhand luxury goods market is experiencing significant growth, accompanied by concerns about authenticity, modifications, and market dynamics. As the sector continues to expand, the issue of distinguishing genuine items from counterfeit ones has become increasingly important.
According to Vogue, the secondhand-apparel market was estimated to be worth $28 billion in 2019 and is projected to surpass $64 billion by 2024, growing 25 times faster than the retail market. This growth has raised legal challenges, exemplified in the case of Chanel Inc. v. RealReal Inc. The RealReal, a California-based company, specializes in the resale of secondhand luxury items and guarantees the authenticity of the products it sells. However, Chanel has accused The RealReal of selling eight counterfeit “Chanel” items to customers.
Chanel contends that consumers can only ensure they are purchasing genuine CHANEL products by buying them from Chanel or authorized Chanel retailers. Chanel does not deal in secondhand goods and does not authenticate any secondhand Chanel inventory. The law holds entities that take possession of goods strictly liable for trademark infringement under Section 32(1)(a) of the Lanham Act.
Trademark law is designed to protect consumers from confusion and deception, ensuring that purchased items retain the brand’s characteristics. In general, a person selling counterfeit items within the marketplace may be liable for violating trademark law. While individuals have the right to sell, display, or offer goods under their original trademark, this right does not apply to items that differ materially from those sold by the trademark holder.
The Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. Meece case, heard in the Fifth Circuit, provides insight into what constitutes “materially different” in the context of the secondhand luxury goods market. The court found that replacing essential components of a Rolex watch with non-Rolex approved parts or making non-Rolex customizations rendered the entire watch counterfeit. This decision clearly defined which parts of a Rolex watch were considered necessary and integral, leading to a counterfeit designation.
However, applying the same standard to other luxury goods, such as Christian Louboutin heels or Chanel bags, becomes more challenging. For example, replacing a heel tap at a local cobbler may be seen as a replacement of a necessary and integral part, but it doesn’t necessarily render the entire product counterfeit.
This raises questions about how strict the definition of material alteration should be, especially when alterations are necessary for repair or maintenance. Luxury brands may maintain a strict definition of material alteration to protect their new goods market.
The sale of counterfeit goods has evolved from street vendors to online platforms like eBay, Poshmark, and The RealReal. In Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., the court introduced the concept of contributory trademark infringement to online marketplaces. While eBay was not held liable for trademark infringement, the ruling raised questions about the authenticity of luxury goods sold online.
The ruling effectively rewards online platforms for not exercising sufficient control over the authenticity of items, creating uncertainty for consumers. Companies like The RealReal must either guarantee authenticity 100% of the time or switch to a model where they don’t take possession of goods, potentially allowing more inauthentic items to be sold.
This approach disincentivizes control over goods and makes platforms adopt a hands-off approach. While companies like The RealReal shouldn’t make absolute authenticity guarantees, improvements in preventing counterfeit items from entering the market should be encouraged.
In conclusion, the secondhand luxury goods market faces complex challenges related to trademark law, authenticity, and modifications. The legal landscape remains unsettled, and the coexistence of luxury brands and secondhand resellers is a matter of ongoing debate.
Discover top stories in supply chain logistics news on The Supply Chain Report. For free tools related to international trade, visit ADAMftd.com.
